No matter who we are or where we work, we all have to face difficult conversations at some point. Becoming good at handling high-stakes conversations makes work and life easier, and it is a skill employers value because it saves time and money.
Most people are better at it than they fear, but in one specific way. In 7,190 difficult-conversation practice sessions on VirtualSpeech this year, people scored well on delivering their message clearly and calmly. They scored lowest on the two-way parts: asking questions, listening, handling pushback and agreeing on next steps together.
This guide covers what a difficult conversation is, how to prepare, eight steps for handling one, and what our practice data shows about which conversations are hardest and how to improve. Much of the technique is based on the book Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High by Patterson, Grenny, McMillan, and Switzler.
What is a difficult conversation?
A difficult conversation is a discussion between two or more people where:
- The stakes are high
- Opinions differ
- Emotions run strong
- The outcome significantly affects their lives, with a real risk of negative consequences
At work, that might mean telling someone they didn’t get a promotion, raising poor performance, delivering redundancy news, or speaking up about a flaw in a project. Conflict is a natural part of working with people who have different experiences, motivations, and opinions. Handled well, it becomes an opportunity for growth and progress.
How to recognise you’re in one
- Physical signs: sweating, a faster heart rate, shallow breathing, a dry throat, tension.
- Emotional signs: a strong response such as fear or anger.
- Behavioural signs: avoiding the issue, going quiet, not saying what you really think, or raising your voice.
Is it time for a difficult conversation?
Four signs suggest a conversation is overdue:
- Performance gaps. Someone consistently misses expectations.
- Interpersonal conflict. Tension or communication breakdowns within the team.
- Complaints. Team members complain about each other, or you find yourself complaining about someone.
- Your own feelings. You feel annoyed, resentful or angry about a situation.
Why communication fails
The higher the stakes and the stronger the emotions, the harder it is to communicate well. Stress makes your voice and facial expressions harder to control, and it becomes harder to structure your thoughts. The cost of getting it wrong can reach your career, relationships and health.
Are you an avoider or an aggressor?
Most of us lean towards one of two defaults.
Avoiders dislike confrontation. In a VitalSmarts survey of 1,025 managers and employees who failed to speak up about a concern, people instead complained to others (78%), did extra or unnecessary work (66%), ruminated (53%) or got angry (50%). Avoiders usually worry about hurting feelings, the other person’s reaction, their own emotions, damaging the relationship, or a worst-case scenario they have built up in their head. Avoiding the issue usually prolongs the problem.
Aggressors try to resolve conflict through what they see as strong leadership. Their abrupt approach can verge on bullying. They tend to overestimate their ability to handle sensitive situations, rush in, and make things worse.
Our practice data shows a version of this too. Very few people are aggressive: “non-confrontational language” is one of the highest-scoring skills across our scenarios. The more common problem is the opposite. People soften the message so much that they don’t ask enough questions or agree a clear way forward.
Which difficult conversations are hardest?
Telling someone they didn’t get a promotion is the hardest workplace conversation to get right. In 2026, people averaged 5.9 out of 10 on it, and only 9% scored 8 or above. Delivering layoff news was close behind at 6.0. Addressing poor performance was the easiest of the eight, at 6.8, with 28% scoring 8 or above.
The hardest conversations share one feature: the news is about something the other person cares deeply about and can’t change, such as their career or their job. That makes them more likely to push back or get upset, and that is where most people lose their footing.
How to have a difficult conversation: 8 steps
Before you start: set the conversation up for success
- Decide what you’re dealing with. An isolated event, a recurring problem, or an interpersonal issue? Someone who arrived an hour late once needs a different conversation from someone who has been late every day for two weeks.
- Know why you’re having it. Decide your preferred outcome: more information, an apology, a plan. It keeps you focused when emotions rise.
- Separate observations from assumptions. Build what you say on facts you saw or heard, not on your interpretation of them.
- Choose the right time and place. Somewhere private, when everyone can give it their full attention. For remote conversations, make sure the audio is clear, and distractions are minimal.
- Expect it to be hard for them too. Go in with empathy, and assume you have something to learn.
1. Start with yourself
When you feel threatened, you may abandon what you wanted to say and protect yourself instead. Ask: What do I really want for myself, for the other person, and for our relationship? How would I behave if I really wanted that?
Watch for the “Sucker’s Choice”: telling yourself you must choose between honesty and harmony. Say what you want and what you don’t want, then look for a way to get both. For example: “How can I have an honest discussion with Sam about reliability without causing tension or wasting time?”
2. Listen actively, and ask before you assume
Be fully present, paraphrase what you hear, and ask open questions that invite the other person’s side. This is where most people fall short. In our practice data, “open-ended questions” averaged 5.1 out of 10 in a disciplinary conversation and “clarifying questions” averaged 5.1 when raising misuse of a work phone, among the lowest scores in any scenario.
Useful questions:
- “Can you talk me through what happened from your side?”
- “What’s been making this difficult?”
- “Is there anything I’m missing?”
3. Notice when safety is at risk
When people feel unsafe, they move to silence or violence.
- Silence: masking (sarcasm, sugar-coating), avoiding the topic, or withdrawing.
- Violence: controlling the conversation, labelling people, or attacking them.
Monitor yourself as well as the other person. Notice what you do under stress, and adjust.
4. Make it safe to share
Safety breaks down when there is a lack of mutual purpose (they don’t believe you care about their goals) or mutual respect (they don’t believe you respect them). To restore it:
- Apologise when you’ve made a mistake that affected them.
- Contrast to fix a misunderstanding: say what you don’t intend, then what you do. “I don’t want you to think I’m unhappy with all your work. I do want to talk about the last two deadlines.”
5. Watch the non-verbal cues
People’s words can say one thing while their body language says another. If you see defensive or negative body language, stay calm, ask how they’re feeling, and don’t jump to conclusions. Keep your own body language open: face the person, lean slightly forward and nod to encourage them.
6. Master your stories
Strong emotions follow a “Path to Action”: you see or hear something, tell yourself a story about it, feel an emotion, then act. If a colleague leaves 30 minutes early and you decide they’re lazy, you may snap at them the next day. If you’d learned they left because their partner was taken to hospital, you’d react differently.
Watch for three “clever stories” that excuse us:
- Victim stories: “It’s not my fault.” Turn victims into actors: what part did I play?
- Villain stories: “They’re doing this on purpose.” Turn villains into humans: why would a reasonable person do this?
- Helpless stories: “There’s nothing I can do.” Turn helpless into able: what do I really want, and what would I do if I wanted it?
7. Choose your language: STATE your path
- Share your facts. “I’ve noticed you’ve missed the last two team meetings.”
- Tell your story, as your interpretation, not as fact.
- Ask for their path. “Do you see this differently?”
- Talk tentatively. “From my point of view…” or “I get the impression that…”
- Encourage testing. “Let’s say I’m mistaken. What if the opposite is true?”
8. Use a simple conversation framework
- Give a brief overview of what you want to discuss.
- Explain why you want to have the conversation.
- Describe the behaviour you have observed.
- Ask for their perspective, and listen.
- Agree specific next steps together, with goals and dates.
- Explain any consequences, and confirm how you’ll follow up.
Steps 4 and 5 are the ones people rush. In our data, “finding joint solutions” was the weakest skill in a poor-performance conversation, and “establishing the way forward” the weakest in a coaching conversation with a disillusioned employee.
Where people go wrong: the two-way parts
People deliver the message well and struggle with everything that depends on the other person. In every scenario that scored both, skills such as asking questions, listening and agreeing next steps together scored 0.5 to 1.1 points lower than delivering a clear, calm, factual message.
The lowest-scoring skills across all eight scenarios:
| Skill | Scenario | Average score (out of 10) |
|---|---|---|
| Presenting evidence | Negotiating with a trade union | 4.7 |
| Open-ended questions | Disciplinary: discriminatory language | 5.1 |
| Clarifying questions | Raising misuse of a work phone | 5.1 |
| Refuting unfounded allegations | Telling someone they didn’t get a promotion | 5.2 |
| Encouraging discussion, offering support | Telling someone they didn’t get a promotion | 5.4 |
| Creating a safe environment | Delivering layoff news | 5.5 |
The highest-scoring were non-confrontational language (7.0 when raising misuse of a work phone) and focusing on behaviour rather than the person (7.0 in the disciplinary conversation).
A single overall impression hides these gaps. Within the same conversation, the difference between a person’s best and worst skill averaged 2.3 points, and in 28% of sessions it was 3 points or more. Someone can sound calm and clear yet still leave without hearing the other side.
What if the conversation goes wrong?
Even with good preparation, emotionally charged conversations can stall. When you’re stuck in a battle of wills, Crucial Conversations suggests CRIB:
- C – Commit to find common ground. Step back from the content and say you want a solution that works for both of you.
- R – Recognise the purpose behind the strategy. Ask why each of you wants what you’re asking for. Two people fighting over a meeting room on Thursday may both just need a private space.
- I – Invent a mutual purpose. If your purposes genuinely conflict, find a broader, longer-term goal you both share.
- B – Brainstorm new strategies that serve that shared purpose.
In our data, pushback is where people struggle most. “Refuting unfounded allegations” averaged 5.2 out of 10 when an employee reacted badly to promotion news, and “presenting evidence” averaged 4.7 in a negotiation with a trade union. Prepare two or three specific facts before the conversation, so you can respond calmly when challenged.
Turn the conversation into action
Ideas don’t happen if nobody knows who decided what, or if no one follows up. Before you finish:
- Who? Give each action an owner.
- What? Make each responsibility specific.
- By when? Set a deadline.
- Follow-up: Agree how and when you’ll check in, and write it down.
If promises aren’t kept, it’s time for another conversation.
How to get better: practise, and retry when it goes badly
Practice improves difficult conversations quickly, especially when the first attempt goes badly. We looked at 1,266 people who practised the same scenario twice on their own account. Two-thirds (66%) scored higher the second time, by 0.6 points on average.
| First attempt score | People | Average second attempt | Change | Share who improved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Below 5 | 283 | 5.7 | +2.2 | 87% |
| 5 to 6 | 180 | 6.4 | +0.9 | 79% |
| 6 to 7 | 257 | 6.8 | +0.3 | 69% |
| 7 to 8 | 399 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 55% |
| 8 or above | 147 | 7.9 | −0.4 | 37% |
Three lessons stand out:
- Retry straight away after a bad first attempt. People who scored below 6 and tried again within 15 minutes gained 1.9 points, as much as those who waited a day.
- Once you score 7 or more, move on. Repeating the same scenario adds little. Try a harder conversation instead.
- Keep going. People who did a scenario three or more times went from 5.9 on their first attempt to 6.8 on their third, and their best score averaged 7.5.
Yet in 61% of cases, people tried a scenario only once.
Action points: reflect on how you usually respond in tense situations, ask a colleague how you come across, pick the conversation you find hardest, and rehearse it before you have it for real.
Frequently asked questions
What is the hardest difficult conversation at work?
In our 2026 practice data, telling an employee they didn’t get a promotion was the hardest, averaging 5.9 out of 10. Only 9% of sessions scored 8 or above. Delivering layoff news was close behind at 6.0.
How do you start a difficult conversation?
State the purpose briefly and calmly, describe what you observed, then ask for the other person’s view. For example: “I’d like to talk about the last two project deadlines. Both were a few days late. Can you talk me through what happened?”
What do people get wrong most often?
The two-way parts. People deliver their message clearly and politely, but ask too few questions, struggle when the other person pushes back, and leave without agreeing next steps together.
How do you end a difficult conversation?
Summarise what you’ve agreed, confirm who will do what by when, and set a date to follow up. Close by acknowledging the conversation was hard and thanking them for engaging.
How can you practise difficult conversations?
Rehearse with a colleague, a coach or an AI roleplay, ideally one that gives feedback on specific skills. If your first attempt goes badly, try again straight away: in our data, people who scored below 5 improved by 2.2 points on their second attempt.
How we did this analysis
We analysed 7,190 completed roleplays from 1 January to 13 October 2026, across eight VirtualSpeech library scenarios: Disappointing Promotion News, Poor Employee Performance, Delivering Layoff News, Missed Targets, Misuse of Work Phone, Disciplinary (Discriminatory Language), Disillusioned Staff Member, and Director vs. Trade Union.
- Who: 1,850 accounts at 210 organisations: university students (4,339 sessions), individual learners (1,694) and employees at companies and public bodies (1,157).
- Scoring: each session was scored by AI from 0 to 10 overall and on five criteria specific to the scenario. Sessions in other languages were matched to the same criteria.
- Excluded: anonymous free-trial sessions, internal and test accounts, and sessions with no valid score.
- Second attempts: some organisations share one login between several people, often on VR headsets. We used only individual accounts (1,266 people) to measure improvement between attempts.
- Limits: scores come from AI, not human assessors. We are running a study comparing our AI scores with certified coaches and will publish the results. People who retried chose to, so their results may not represent everyone.
All data was anonymised and aggregated.
Related reading:
